| NAME OF THE COURSE |
Reaction Engineering |
|---|
Code |
|
Course teacher |
Prof Davor Rušić |
Credits (ECTS) |
3.5 |
|
Associate teachers |
Prof Sandra Svilović |
Type of instruction (number of hours) |
|
|
Status of the course |
Mandatory |
Percentage of application of e-learning |
0 % |
|
| COURSE DESCRIPTION |
Course objectives |
To familiarize students with the principles of reactor designing. |
Course enrolment requirements and entry competences required for the course |
Enrolled in or passed the course Transport Phenomena
Enrolled in or passed the course Exercises in Reaction Engineering |
Learning outcomes expected at the level of the course (4 to 10 learning outcomes) |
Kinetic analysis, analysis of reactor. |
Course content broken down in detail by weekly class schedule (syllabus) |
Week 1: The concept of chemical reactors.
Week 2: The mathematical description of the general equations of balance and mass transfer.
Week 3: Reactor models of ideal reactor types.
Week 4: The kinetics of chemical reactions in homogeneous systems.
Week 5: Goals of kinetic studies.
Week 6: Selection of the experimental reactor.
Week 7: Selection of kinetic models.
Week 8: Selection of methods for estimation of kinetic parameters.
Week 9: The systematization contents taught
Week 10: First test
Week 11: The kinetics of reactions in heterogeneous systems.
Week 12: The problem of the presence of physical processes accompanying a chemical reaction.
Week 13: Experimental methods in kinetic studies of reaction systems fluid-solid, gas-liquid and reaction with solid catalysts.
Week 14: The factors that determine the choice of the reactor.
Week 15: Second test |
Format of instruction: |
|
Student responsibilities |
Regular attendance and active participation at lectures, seminars and exercises. |
Screening student work (name the proportion of ECTS credits for eachactivity so that the total number of ECTS credits is equal to the ECTS value of the course): |
Class attendance |
0.0 |
Research |
0.0 |
Practical training |
0.0 |
Experimental work |
0.0 |
Report |
0.0 |
|
|
Essay |
0.0 |
Seminar essay |
0.0 |
|
|
Tests |
2.0 |
Oral exam |
0.0 |
|
|
Written exam |
0.0 |
Project |
0.0 |
|
|
|
Grading and evaluating student work in class and at the final exam |
Grading and evaluating student work in class and at the final exam:
A student can pass a part or the entire exam by taking two partial tests during the semester. Students who do not pass the partial exams have to take an exam in the regular examination term. During the examination terms students take written and oral exam.
Scoring: <55% insufficient;55-66% sufficient (2); 67-79% good (3); 80-92% very good (4); 93-100% excellent (5) |
Required literature (available in the library and via other media) |
Title |
Number of copies in the library |
Availability via other media |
O. Levenspiele, Chemical engineering |
0 |
|
Z Gomzi, Kemijski reaktori |
10 |
|
S.Slavica, D.Rušić, Interactive MathCad collection of task for reaction engineering |
5 |
|
|
Optional literature (at the time of submission of study programme proposal) |
|
Quality assurance methods that ensure the acquisition of exit competences |
Quality assurance methods that ensure the acquisition of exit competences:
Quality of the teaching and learning, monitored at the level of the
(1) teachers, accepting suggestions of students and colleagues, and
(2) faculty, conducting surveys of students on teaching quality. |
Other (as the proposer wishes to add) |
|
